Online course: List of references

The following is a list of references included in the online courses:

Ballard, C. and Prine, R. (2002) Citizens' Perceptions of Community Policing: comparing internet and mail survey responses. Social Science Computer Review, 20 , 485-493.

Bampton, R. and Cowton, C. J. (2002) The E-interview, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3, 2.
http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-02/2-02bamptoncowton-e.htm.

Bosnjak, M. and Tuten, T. L. (2001) Classifying response behaviors in web-based surveys, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6, 3.
http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue3/boznjak.html.

British Psychological Society (2002) Guidelines for ethical practice in psychological research online.
http://www.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/conducting_research_on_the_internet-guidelines_for_ethical_practice_in_psychological_research_online.pdf.

Bruckman, A. (2002a) Ethical Guidelines for Research online
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~asb/ethics/.

Cameron, K. A., Salazar, L.F., Bernhardt, J. M., Burgess-Whitman, N., Wingood, G. M. and DiClemente, R.M. (2005) Adolescents’ experience with sex on the web: results from online focus groups. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 4, 535–540.

Chen, P. and Hinton, S. M. (1999) Realtime interviewing using the world wide web. Sociological Research Online, 4, 3.
http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/3/chen.html.

Chen, S. S. , Hall, G. J. and Johns, M. D. (2004) Research paparazzi in cyberspace: The voices of the researched, in Johns, M. D., Chen, S. S. and Hall, G. J. (Eds.) (2004) Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, and Ethics. New York. Peter Lang. pp.157-175.

Coomber, R. (1997) Using the Internet for survey research, Sociological Research Online, 2, 2.
http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/2/2.html.

Davis, M., Golding, G., Hart, G., Sherr, L. and Elford, J. (2004) Reflecting on the experience of interviewing online: perspectives from the Internet and HIV study in London, Aids Care, 16, 8, 944-952.

Economic and Social Research Council (2005) Research Ethics Framework.
http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/Framework_for_Research_Ethics_tcm8-4586.pdf.

Ellison, N., Heino, R., and Gibbs, J. (2006) Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 2, article 2.
http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/ellison.html.

Ess, C. and AoIR Ethics Working Committee (2002) Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations form the AoIR ethics working committee.
http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf.

Eysenbach, G. and Till, J. (2001) Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities, British Medical Journal, 323, 7321, 1103-1105.

Gross, R. and Acquisti, A. (2005) Information Revelation and Privacy in Online Social Networks (The Facebook case). Pre-proceedings version. ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES).
http://www.heinz.cmu.edu/~acquisti/papers/ privacy-facebook-gross-acquisti.pdf.

Hargittai, E. (2007) Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 1, article 14.
http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/hargittai.html.

Hughes, J. and Lang, K. (2004) Issues in Online Focus Groups: Lessons learned from an empirical study of peer-to-peer filesharing system users.  Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2, 2, 95-110.

Jagger, E. (2005) Is thirty the new sixty? Dating, age and gender in a postmodern consumer society.  Sociology 39, 1, 89-106.

James, N. (2007) The use of email interviewing as a qualitative method of inquiry in educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 6, 963-976.

James, N. and Busher, H. (2006) Credibility, authenticity and voice: Dilemmas in online interviewing, Qualitative Research, 6, 3, 403-420.

Kapoor, N., Konstan, J., and Terveen, L. (2005). How Peer Photos Influence Member Participation in Online Communities. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2005, April 2–7, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA.
http://www.grouplens.org/papers/pdf/lbr-590-kapoor.pdf.

Lawson, H. and Leck, K. (2006) Dynamics of Internet Dating. Social Science Computer Review, 24, 2, 189-208.

Leander, K. and McKim, K. (2003) Tracing the Everyday 'Sitings' of Adolescents on the Internet: a strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces.  Education, Communication & Information, 3, 2, 211 - 240.

Livingstone, S. and Bober, M. (2004) UK Children Go Online: surveying the experiences of young people and their parents. London: LSE Research Online.

Mann, C. and Stewart, F. (2000) Internet Communication and Qualitative Research. London. Sage.

O’Connor, H. and Madge, C. (2001) Cyber-mothers: Online synchronous interviewing using conferencing software. Sociological Research Online, 5, 4.
http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/4/o'connor.html.

Paccagnella, L. (1997) Getting the seat of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3, 1.
http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue1/paccagnella.html.

Reips, U.-D. (2002) Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 4, 243-256
http://www.psychologie.unizh.ch/sowi/reips/papers/exppsy/ExPsyReipsReprint.pdf.

Rezabek, R. J. (2000) Online focus groups: Electronic discussions for research, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1, 1.
http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1128.

Salmon, G. (2002) E-tivities: a key to active online learning.  Routledge, London.

Schneider, S., Kerwin, J., Frechtling, J. and Vivari, B. (2002) Characteristics of the discussion in online and face-to-face focus groups.  Social Science Computer Review, 20, 1, 31-42.

Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. and Huber, O. (2003) Information search in the laboratory and on the Web: With or without an experimenter, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 35, 2, 227-23.

Stewart, F., Eckermann, E. and Zhou, K. (1998) Using the Internet in qualitative public health research: A comparison of Chinese and Australian young women's perceptions of tobacco. Internet Journal of Health Promotion.

Stewart, K and Williams M. (2005) Researching online populations: the use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research, 5, 4, 395-416.

Sweet, C (1999). Designing and Conducting Virtual Focus Groups. Quirk's Marketing Research Review, 0548.

Sweet, C. (2001) Designing and conducting virtual focus groups. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 4, 3, 30 -135.

Whitty, M. (2005) The Realness of Cybercheating: Men's and Women's Representations of Unfaithful Internet Relationships. Social Science Computer Review 23, 1, 57-67.

Williams, M. (2007) Avatar watching: participant observation in graphical online environments. Qualitative Research, 7, 1, 5-24.