About this Resource
What’s in a proposal?
Who are you writing your proposal for?
Why the criteria for evaluating your proposal matter so much
Evidence of success – a funder’s perspective
Demonstrating how your proposal meets the assessment criteria
Ensuring that your submitted proposal will get as far as the review process
Developing an overall argument to convince the assessors and reviewers
Warranting the conclusion of your overall argument
Telling a convincing story
Sources of information to consult in preparing a research proposal for the ESRC
Checking where to include components of your overall argument in any proposal
A research proposal logic checksheet
Illustration: a completed logic checksheet for a successful ESRC research proposal
Ensuring that assessors and reviewers get your message
Getting your message across
Subjecting your draft proposal to multiple checks
Final tip – build all the secrets of success into your habitual practice
Checking where to include components of your overall argument in any proposal 
Networked Cranfield > AIM Research > Key Topics > Developing proposals > Checking where to include components of your overall argument in any proposal
 

There is a lot of overlap in the information required by different funding agencies. Assessors will need to know what you are proposing to do, why it matters, how you will do it, who stands to benefit, how much the work will cost, and whether you are capable of conducting the proposed research successfully. So whatever the funding agency you are applying to, the main components of your overall argument will be similar. You may insert material in different places, and in a different order, but it will still be designed to convince the assessors and reviewers of your overall argument, persuading them that your proposal is worth funding.

You could complete the following check for each component of the material entailed in submitting a research grant proposal to your chosen funding agency. Go through each section, in turn, of the application form (or guidance if there is no form) and any other material required as part of your submission. For each component, identify whether you can use it as part of the conclusion or the warranting for the conclusion of your overall argument for funding.

The conclusion will comprise your claims about the anticipated outputs and the impacts of your proposed research on the target beneficiaries. The warranting will comprise everything else in your submission. It is designed to convince the assessors or reviewers that your research focus is important and that what you are proposing to do stands a very good chance of achieving your projected outputs and impacts.

 Funding Agency (eg Leverhulme Trust)

 

 

Summary of material required for submitting a research proposal (eg application form, principal applicant’s CV)

 

 

Component of application material

Element of logic (warranting or conclusion) and its contribution to the argument

application form - title of proposal

warranting – summarises research topic through choice of keywords

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The electronic version of this form for downloading has space for many more components.

(To download and use this document – click on the word document here)