| Home | Staff | Research | Resources | News |
In our completely skewed review of colleagues' opinion about software for qualitative analyses, ATLAS.ti fared best with respect to versatility. If you would like
to
get an informed evaluation about ATLAS.ti, before we have finished our analysis, refer to this review by Tom Wilson from the
University of Sheffield. Note, however, that this review refers to version 4, while ATLAS.ti is currently
about
to release the much improved version 5.
| media methods > research > software evaluation > caqdas > atlas.ti | contact |